NovelAI vs AI Dungeon: A Writing Suite or a Playable Adventure?
NovelAI is a prose tool that happens to run a text adventure; AI Dungeon is a game that happens to produce prose. Pick by what you actually want...
Nastia AI sells conversation and a usable free tier. Candy AI sells the best-looking images in the category. Here is what each one actually charges you, and where both fall short.
Nastia AI and Candy AI get compared constantly, partly because Nastia markets itself directly as a Candy AI alternative. That page is worth reading with one eyebrow raised. Both are paid companion apps for adults, both run on token systems, and both are weaker than their sales pages suggest in one specific area: remembering you over time.
The honest split is simple. Nastia is the chat app. Candy is the picture app. Everything else โ price, memory, voice, privacy โ follows from that.
| Category | Nastia AI | Candy AI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Ongoing chat, roleplay, companionship | Photorealistic images and short videos | Depends on you |
| Monthly price | $11.99 or $15.99 Unlimited | $13.99, or $3.99/mo billed yearly | Candy AI (yearly) |
| Free version | Yes, daily token limits | 5 messages total, 1 character, 1 image | Nastia AI |
| Memory | Advertised persistent; reviewer gaps after days | Storylines reset after 48 to 72 hours | Nastia AI (slightly) |
| Image and video | Stylized images, 1080p video on Unlimited | Most realistic, image-to-video, Live Action | Candy AI |
| Voice | Voice messages, custom voice cloning | Voice messages, beta voice calls | Candy AI |
| Group chats | Up to 10 companions | Not documented | Nastia AI |
| Company | Nastia Cybernetics (France) | EverAI Limited (Malta) | Both EU |
| Watch out for | Contradictory free-tier wording, token media | 100 tokens a month, strict refunds | โ |
For the wider field, our AI girlfriend reviews hub lists every app we have scored in one place.
Nastia AI is run by Nastia Cybernetics, a French company. It leans into conversation: persistent memory is advertised on every plan, group chats hold up to ten companions, and the pricing is flat rather than credit-heavy. It advertises 800,000+ users, a company figure we cannot verify. Traffic estimates put it around 548,000 monthly organic visits.
Candy.ai is run by EverAI Limited, registered in Malta. Its library covers girls, guys and anime characters, and its reputation rests on image quality. Organic traffic sits around 332,000 monthly visits, though a large share arrives through affiliate links โ which is worth knowing when you read a glowing Candy write-up on some other site.
Both are 18+ products. Neither has a native iOS or Android app; you use the mobile browser or desktop, and both can be installed as a progressive web app.
Candy gives you the more granular builder: body type, style, ethnicity, age, hair, personality, voice and hobbies. Reviewers consistently call it the more detailed tool. Custom characters cost around 10 tokens each, and the free plan allows exactly one.
Nastia says it offers unlimited character creation at no extra cost. Take that as a vendor claim, but it is consistent with the app's positioning โ Nastia wants you chatting, not buying extras.
This is messier than either company admits.
Nastia advertises persistent memory on every plan. Reviewers report something more modest. One says roughly 50+ recent messages are held. Another saw memory last about two weeks. A third test remembered a detail on day four and had lost it by day seven. Resets without warning are the most common complaint in user reports.
Candy's storylines reportedly reset after 48 to 72 hours. Rivals Bonza.Chat and Kalon claim Candy memory fades after 10 to 15 messages โ those are competitor claims, not measurements, so treat them as opinion. More neutral reviewers describe Candy replies as fine within a session but repetitive over weeks. Candy Premium Plus adds 20 memory slots and user personas, which helps if you pay for it.
On chat quality itself, one review rated Nastia warm and around 8/10, noting it adapts to your mood. Candy gets called shallow mostly by competitors; the fairer read is that it is decent in the moment and thin over months.
Practical advice for either: put the facts you care about in the character's backstory or memory slots. Do not trust the app to hold them.
If memory is your main priority, neither of these is the answer. Secrets AI uses editable Lorebooks, and Nomi AI runs three memory layers. Our Secrets AI vs Candy AI comparison goes into that difference.
Candy wins this section without much of a fight. Its images are rated among the best in the category, with consistent faces. It does image-to-video and a Live Action mode. Recent reviews put images at about 4 tokens each, though older sources say 2 โ assume the higher figure when budgeting. Video conversion costs around 12 tokens, and there is no text-to-video.
Nastia generates stylized images, takes 30 to 60 seconds, and costs 10 tokens per image. It stumbles on complex prompts. It does allow reference photo uploads to keep a face consistent, which is a genuinely useful feature for regulars. Video arrived in 2025; clips are short and uneven, and some users report instability. The Unlimited plan includes 1080p video and 4K selfies.
On voice: Nastia offers voice messages and custom voice cloning. Candy offers voice messages and beta voice calls at roughly 3 tokens per minute. Note that Nastia's own comparison page claims voice calls are included, but we found no live call feature on its feature pages โ a good example of why vendor comparisons deserve suspicion.
| Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 5 messages total, 1 custom character, 1 image |
| Premium monthly | $13.99/month | Unlimited messages, 18+ images and video, 100 tokens a month |
| Premium 3 months | $8.99/month ($26.97) | Same, 100 tokens a month |
| Premium 12 months | $3.99/month ($47.88) | Same, 100 tokens a month |
| Premium Plus | Not listed publicly | 330 tokens, personas, 20 memory slots, chat clones |
That 100 tokens a month is the catch. At roughly 4 tokens per image, you get about 25 images before you are topping up. Top-ups are reported from $9.99 for 100 tokens. Independent reviewers estimate heavy media users spend $25 to $80 a month on Candy once top-ups are counted.
Nastia's comparison page claims Candy costs $30โ50 a month with fees, and cites $0.20 per image and $0.30 per call minute. Run the arithmetic at $9.99 per 100 tokens and you get about $0.40 per image and $0.30 per call minute. Nastia's image figure looks low. Its $12.99 rival monthly figure also looks out of date โ Candy listed $13.99 when data was last checked on September 30, 2026.
| Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Chat with daily token limits, no card needed |
| Basic / Standard | $11.99/month | Listed by Nastia, contents not described |
| Unlimited | $15.99/month | Unlimited messages, 4K selfies, voice messages, 1080p video, multiple companions, voice cloning |
Nastia claims flat pricing, no hidden fees and no token traps. That is not quite true. Images and voice notes still consume tokens. Token packs are reported from 500 for $3.99, Unlimited reportedly includes around 3,000 bonus tokens a month, and annual billing is reported from about $8.33 a month. Plan names also shift between pages โ Basic on one, Standard on another โ which makes checking before you buy more important than usual.
"Unlimited" on Nastia means messages, not media. Read it that way and the pricing makes sense.
Nastia's free tier is the more usable of the two: chat with daily token limits, no card required. Reviewers report around 40 free daily tokens. The wording is contradictory, though โ the girlfriend page says "free forever, no lockout" while the pricing card says daily token limits. Believe the pricing card.
Candy's free tier is a demo, not a product: 5 messages total, one custom character, one image, and no 18+ media.
Candy allows NSFW chat and images for Premium subscribers. It bans content resembling minors and reports CSAM to NCMEC. Nastia's terms ban minors including aged-up characters, non-consensual content and impersonation. Nastia says it offers uncensored chat on the free tier, though one review found no NSFW content there at all.
Both are registered EU companies operating under GDPR. Neither offers end-to-end encryption.
Candy uses TLS 1.2+ in transit. Its prompts and outputs may be de-identified and used for model training, with some human review. Message content is shared with third-party model providers, hosting and moderation vendors. Account data is kept up to three years after last activity. Charges appear as EverAI on your statement.
Nastia's policy was updated September 16, 2026. Encryption in transit only. It says it does not sell personal data, but data goes to cloud, AI, payment, analytics and ad processors, some in the US. The policy does not explicitly mention model training โ which is not the same as saying it does not happen. Account deletion is immediate, but cancel the subscription first, and violation records are kept up to seven years.
Refunds are where Candy gets strict: 24 hours, 20 tokens or fewer used, card payments only. EU and UK users get a prorated 14-day withdrawal right. Nastia subscriptions auto-renew and purchases are generally non-refundable.
Basic hygiene for either: separate email, no real name, address or photos, and assume everything you type is stored. Reviewers also flag emotional dependence and loneliness as real risks โ worth a moment of honesty with yourself before subscribing.
Pick Nastia if you want a companion to talk to daily, you care about roleplay and group scenes, and you would rather not pay per picture. It is also the better choice if you are leaving Candy over shallow chat or token burn โ Nastia is a reasonable landing spot, though not a fix for memory.
Pick Candy if the visuals are the point. If you want photorealistic images, short video clips and occasional voice calls, and you are willing to budget for top-ups, Candy delivers more per dollar on media. The yearly plan at $3.99/month is the cheapest way in, but only makes sense if you accept that 100 tokens will not stretch far.
Start monthly on either. Check how fast you burn tokens in week one before committing to a year.
For more head-to-heads, see Candy AI vs OurDream AI and CrushOn AI vs Candy AI. Our full Candy.ai review digs into the token maths in more detail.
If neither fits, the field is crowded:
Ignore the competitor comparison pages, including Nastia's own. Nastia is the better companion app; Candy is the better image generator. Neither has solved long-term memory, both meter media with tokens, and neither offers end-to-end encryption. Choose based on whether you are paying for conversation or for pictures, then watch your token burn for a month before you commit to anything longer.
It depends on what you want. Nastia is better for chat, roleplay and price, while Candy is better for images, video and voice calls. Neither has strong long-term memory.
Candy has the lower base price at $3.99 a month billed yearly, but its 100 monthly tokens run out quickly once you generate images. Nastia's $15.99 Unlimited plan is the better deal for heavy chatting.
Yes, if you are leaving Candy over shallow chat or token costs. No, if you want better visuals, because Candy's images and video are clearly ahead.
It is run by EverAI Limited in Malta under GDPR, with discreet billing and TLS encryption in transit. There is no end-to-end encryption, and chats may be de-identified for model training, so share nothing you would not want stored.
No. Neither has a native iOS or Android app. Both work in the mobile browser or on desktop and can be installed as a progressive web app.
No. Messages are unlimited on the Unlimited plan, but images and voice notes still use tokens, and the free plan has daily token limits.
Realistic AI companions with strong memory, video and voice calls